<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All In Or All Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2009/12/all-in-or-all-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2009/12/all-in-or-all-out/</link>
	<description>Drinking the love from her Holy Grail</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Micky 2</title>
		<link>http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2009/12/all-in-or-all-out/#comment-21370</link>
		<dc:creator>Micky 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/?p=6480#comment-21370</guid>
		<description>"If we were to apply Toma’s logic, we’d have to invade Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Pakistan, etc. That ain’t gonna happen"

Nah, I think you're being pretty arrogant in thinking you can think like him.

"Toma confers the mistaken assumption that Iraqis and Afghanis are terrorists who attacked us. "

Really ? Where'd you pull that out from ? I didnt see anything in his post that made the whole middle east inclusive.

We need to start kicking a$$ and exit this stage in our history where were searching for some self gratifying pie in the sky politically correct way to fight wars.
Wars have been averted by diplomacy but history proves that wars are ended with force
We are ay war with people who waged war on us. Not a crime campaign.
They do not wish to transform of corrupt a country to its own benefit such the crimes syndicates you say they are. They want to eliminate our country.
A good criminal would never eliminate the source of its prosperity. Terrorists want nothing of us to be left.
Even when one criminal element wants to eliminate the other they call it war.
Gang wars, turf wars etc...

get it ?

We are at war and need to stop acting like community organizers trying to rid the town of the bad guys who said they are at war with us. The prupose of war and crime are two completely different purposes.
Is it criminal for one country to try and take anothers turf ? Yeah, but its still called war and treated as such in the international laws.
Is genocide a crime ? Yeah, against humanity. But genocide is always the result of a war. It then becomes a war crime.
Is Bush a war criminal ?
Only if you believe its a war hes fighting and fighting against.

As long as this threat has prevailed the means to deal with it so far have failed. Taking 60 years to accomplish nothing with the same methods should be enough for a rational person to figure that out.
Only the insane as you say will keep revisiting the same failed mistakes of the past in some self centered narcissistic vision that what never worked for many many greater minds than theres can work for them.
 Theres always some generation that comes along thinking they can make what never worked before or is clearly failing work for them if they just tweak this and that. As long as the basic foundation is still there it wont succeed. Give it a different name and hope folks wont notice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If we were to apply Toma’s logic, we’d have to invade Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Pakistan, etc. That ain’t gonna happen&#8221;</p>
<p>Nah, I think you&#8217;re being pretty arrogant in thinking you can think like him.</p>
<p>&#8220;Toma confers the mistaken assumption that Iraqis and Afghanis are terrorists who attacked us. &#8221;</p>
<p>Really ? Where&#8217;d you pull that out from ? I didnt see anything in his post that made the whole middle east inclusive.</p>
<p>We need to start kicking a$$ and exit this stage in our history where were searching for some self gratifying pie in the sky politically correct way to fight wars.<br />
Wars have been averted by diplomacy but history proves that wars are ended with force<br />
We are ay war with people who waged war on us. Not a crime campaign.<br />
They do not wish to transform of corrupt a country to its own benefit such the crimes syndicates you say they are. They want to eliminate our country.<br />
A good criminal would never eliminate the source of its prosperity. Terrorists want nothing of us to be left.<br />
Even when one criminal element wants to eliminate the other they call it war.<br />
Gang wars, turf wars etc&#8230;</p>
<p>get it ?</p>
<p>We are at war and need to stop acting like community organizers trying to rid the town of the bad guys who said they are at war with us. The prupose of war and crime are two completely different purposes.<br />
Is it criminal for one country to try and take anothers turf ? Yeah, but its still called war and treated as such in the international laws.<br />
Is genocide a crime ? Yeah, against humanity. But genocide is always the result of a war. It then becomes a war crime.<br />
Is Bush a war criminal ?<br />
Only if you believe its a war hes fighting and fighting against.</p>
<p>As long as this threat has prevailed the means to deal with it so far have failed. Taking 60 years to accomplish nothing with the same methods should be enough for a rational person to figure that out.<br />
Only the insane as you say will keep revisiting the same failed mistakes of the past in some self centered narcissistic vision that what never worked for many many greater minds than theres can work for them.<br />
 Theres always some generation that comes along thinking they can make what never worked before or is clearly failing work for them if they just tweak this and that. As long as the basic foundation is still there it wont succeed. Give it a different name and hope folks wont notice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jersey McJones</title>
		<link>http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2009/12/all-in-or-all-out/#comment-21277</link>
		<dc:creator>Jersey McJones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/?p=6480#comment-21277</guid>
		<description>Well, you got me on that one, Micky!  But there's still a big difference between threathing to bomb a particular country's infrastructure/military/government/factories and actually setting about murdering a billion Muslims.  Also, Toma confers the mistaken assumption that Iraqis and Afghanis are terrorists who attacked us.  They're not.  If we were to apply Toma's logic, we'd have to invade Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Pakistan, etc.  That ain't gonna happen.  So again, he's being completely unrealistic.  But you're point is still taken.

JMJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you got me on that one, Micky!  But there&#8217;s still a big difference between threathing to bomb a particular country&#8217;s infrastructure/military/government/factories and actually setting about murdering a billion Muslims.  Also, Toma confers the mistaken assumption that Iraqis and Afghanis are terrorists who attacked us.  They&#8217;re not.  If we were to apply Toma&#8217;s logic, we&#8217;d have to invade Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Pakistan, etc.  That ain&#8217;t gonna happen.  So again, he&#8217;s being completely unrealistic.  But you&#8217;re point is still taken.</p>
<p>JMJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micky 2</title>
		<link>http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2009/12/all-in-or-all-out/#comment-21276</link>
		<dc:creator>Micky 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/?p=6480#comment-21276</guid>
		<description>JMJ;
"are you suggesting genocide? "


JMJ;
" It’s time to change the entire strategy: fight terrorism with intelligence, diplomacy and law enforcement; and deal with rogue states by simply telling them, “Knock it off or you get carpet bombed.”


Yeah, carpet bombing is real discriminate, isnt it ?
I'm sure they can make bombs that will only kill terrorists and leave the fishmongers unscathed.

Hypocrite</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JMJ;<br />
&#8220;are you suggesting genocide? &#8221;</p>
<p>JMJ;<br />
&#8221; It’s time to change the entire strategy: fight terrorism with intelligence, diplomacy and law enforcement; and deal with rogue states by simply telling them, “Knock it off or you get carpet bombed.”</p>
<p>Yeah, carpet bombing is real discriminate, isnt it ?<br />
I&#8217;m sure they can make bombs that will only kill terrorists and leave the fishmongers unscathed.</p>
<p>Hypocrite</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micky 2</title>
		<link>http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2009/12/all-in-or-all-out/#comment-21275</link>
		<dc:creator>Micky 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/?p=6480#comment-21275</guid>
		<description>" won’t even get into the Afghan/casualty argument with you because you know I’m right, you know Bush is to blame, but you just can’t admit it. So whatever."

Yeah, like the typical little snotty valley girl that hs no clue "Whatever"
Bush is hardly to blame for Obama sitting on his thumbs when if the re enforcements got there sooner many of our guys would still be alive.
THIS IS OBAMAS WAR NOW ! HE OWNS IT ! GROW UP AND BUY A CALENDAR !!

"We were never attacked under Carter. Not in any way like 9/11, "

Thats besides the point. His linp wristed diplomacy caused many of the problems we have today.

" It was with Bush as president that we sufffered the worst terrorist attack in US history. I wouldn’t brag about that if I were you. And if you really think that if Clinton had killed OBL that 98/11 wouldn’t have appened then you don’t know anything whatsoever about terrorism,"

Right, here we go with the snotty elitest crap again.
I never denied the attack happened on Bush watch. But the fact remains that he actually did something about the problem where liberals only made it worse or did nothing.

 "they wanted Bush’s reaction, they wanted people like you to overreact. You gave them everything they wanted."

Yeah right, they wanted Bushs reaction when they bombed the Cole and the Towers the first time.
They waged war on us long before Bush was even thiught.
Anyone who doesnt know these basics is the idiot who knows nothing about terrorism

Carter, Obama and Clinton have never held diplomacy with terrorists. Are you lying or just don’t know any better?

Arafat never came to camp David ?
Obama hasnt said he'll sit down with them unconditionally ?
Carter didnt just meet with HAMAS ? (violating the Logan act)

You're either lying thru your teeth AGAIN or just plain stoooooooooopid.

Nice try, prove me wrong or be quite and just save what image as a thinking human you have left</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; won’t even get into the Afghan/casualty argument with you because you know I’m right, you know Bush is to blame, but you just can’t admit it. So whatever.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, like the typical little snotty valley girl that hs no clue &#8220;Whatever&#8221;<br />
Bush is hardly to blame for Obama sitting on his thumbs when if the re enforcements got there sooner many of our guys would still be alive.<br />
THIS IS OBAMAS WAR NOW ! HE OWNS IT ! GROW UP AND BUY A CALENDAR !!</p>
<p>&#8220;We were never attacked under Carter. Not in any way like 9/11, &#8221;</p>
<p>Thats besides the point. His linp wristed diplomacy caused many of the problems we have today.</p>
<p>&#8221; It was with Bush as president that we sufffered the worst terrorist attack in US history. I wouldn’t brag about that if I were you. And if you really think that if Clinton had killed OBL that 98/11 wouldn’t have appened then you don’t know anything whatsoever about terrorism,&#8221;</p>
<p>Right, here we go with the snotty elitest crap again.<br />
I never denied the attack happened on Bush watch. But the fact remains that he actually did something about the problem where liberals only made it worse or did nothing.</p>
<p> &#8220;they wanted Bush’s reaction, they wanted people like you to overreact. You gave them everything they wanted.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah right, they wanted Bushs reaction when they bombed the Cole and the Towers the first time.<br />
They waged war on us long before Bush was even thiught.<br />
Anyone who doesnt know these basics is the idiot who knows nothing about terrorism</p>
<p>Carter, Obama and Clinton have never held diplomacy with terrorists. Are you lying or just don’t know any better?</p>
<p>Arafat never came to camp David ?<br />
Obama hasnt said he&#8217;ll sit down with them unconditionally ?<br />
Carter didnt just meet with HAMAS ? (violating the Logan act)</p>
<p>You&#8217;re either lying thru your teeth AGAIN or just plain stoooooooooopid.</p>
<p>Nice try, prove me wrong or be quite and just save what image as a thinking human you have left</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jersey McJones</title>
		<link>http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2009/12/all-in-or-all-out/#comment-21267</link>
		<dc:creator>Jersey McJones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 06:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/?p=6480#comment-21267</guid>
		<description>Toma, are you suggesting genocide?  Can you tell the difference between a terrorist and a fish monger in Karachi?  Yeah, right.

Carter never negiotiated with Yasser Arafat when he was president.  Obama never begged Ahmadinejad for anything.  Clinton never negotiated with terrorists and if anything it was his administration that warned the Bush administration about OBL.

You are soooooooooooooo unrealistic sometimes, Toma.

JMJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toma, are you suggesting genocide?  Can you tell the difference between a terrorist and a fish monger in Karachi?  Yeah, right.</p>
<p>Carter never negiotiated with Yasser Arafat when he was president.  Obama never begged Ahmadinejad for anything.  Clinton never negotiated with terrorists and if anything it was his administration that warned the Bush administration about OBL.</p>
<p>You are soooooooooooooo unrealistic sometimes, Toma.</p>
<p>JMJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toma</title>
		<link>http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2009/12/all-in-or-all-out/#comment-21261</link>
		<dc:creator>Toma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/?p=6480#comment-21261</guid>
		<description>Tipster you over analyze and "antithetical to democracy promotion and anglo-american values".  How naive...

You know nothing about defeating the enemy by killing.  Killing everything that moves, leave not one alive.  If you don't the enemy you left alive today will kill you tomorrow.  To defeat terrorists one must use the same tactics the terrorists use only worse.  Terrorists will stop being terrorists when they fear you.  Kill their goats?  You bet, kill them and eat them and let the terrorists see you do it.  

Jers, Carter (Yasser Arafat), Obama (begging Ahmadinejad to talk), Clinton (well he had a terrorist as veep) skirts were more his forte.

Toma</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tipster you over analyze and &#8220;antithetical to democracy promotion and anglo-american values&#8221;.  How naive&#8230;</p>
<p>You know nothing about defeating the enemy by killing.  Killing everything that moves, leave not one alive.  If you don&#8217;t the enemy you left alive today will kill you tomorrow.  To defeat terrorists one must use the same tactics the terrorists use only worse.  Terrorists will stop being terrorists when they fear you.  Kill their goats?  You bet, kill them and eat them and let the terrorists see you do it.  </p>
<p>Jers, Carter (Yasser Arafat), Obama (begging Ahmadinejad to talk), Clinton (well he had a terrorist as veep) skirts were more his forte.</p>
<p>Toma</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jersey McJones</title>
		<link>http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2009/12/all-in-or-all-out/#comment-21258</link>
		<dc:creator>Jersey McJones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 02:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/?p=6480#comment-21258</guid>
		<description>"One person who I had never met before, said he was so upset over
Obama’s continuing the war there, he turned his TV set to other channels, only to see Obama’s face on all."

Dan, you should tell your new aquaintance to tradein those old rabbit ears and get cable.

"Then I asked the four persons to give me one example of what Obama
and his leftist Democractic administration have accomplished, just one? 

No one gave me an answer."

I don't believe you.  Either you're four aquaintances are brain-damaged, or they would have said:

1:  Tax cuts and credits for 95% of Americans, to help with school, stimulate the economy, keep more pay in the pockets of workers, amounting to 282 billion dollars, more than Bush ever cut in one year.

2:  Put 19 bil of the stimulus money to install a new universal healthcare IT system that could save thousands of lives, billions of dollars, and millions of hours of wasteful paperwork.

3:  Approved thousands of highway projects to overhaul our aging transportation infrastructure, something the Bush administration completely neglected.

4:  Added two million acres to our protected lands.

5:  Stopped the recession and began the road to recovery, averting a possible depression.

And on and on.  has he done enough for me?  No.  has he don;e what you guys want?  Of course not.  Has he accomplished nothing?  You'd have to live under a rock to beieve that stupidity.

Micky,

I won't even get into the Afghan/casualty argument with you because you know I'm right, you know Bush is to blame, but you just can't admit it.  So whatever.

We were never attacked under Carter.  Not in any way like 9/11, anyway.  It was with Bush as president that we sufffered &lt;em&gt;the worst terrorist attack in US history&lt;/em&gt;.  I wouldn't brag about that if I were you.  And if you really think that if Clinton had killed OBL that 98/11 wouldn't have appened then you don't know anything whatsoever about terrorism, or 9/11, or modern history.  The terrorists of 9/11 &lt;em&gt;wanted&lt;/em&gt; war, they &lt;em&gt;wanted&lt;/em&gt; Bush's reaction, they &lt;em&gt;wanted&lt;/em&gt; people like you to overreact.  You gave them everything they wanted.

Carter, Obama and Clinton have never held diplomacy with terrorists.  Are you lying or just don't know any better?

JMJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;One person who I had never met before, said he was so upset over<br />
Obama’s continuing the war there, he turned his TV set to other channels, only to see Obama’s face on all.&#8221;</p>
<p>Dan, you should tell your new aquaintance to tradein those old rabbit ears and get cable.</p>
<p>&#8220;Then I asked the four persons to give me one example of what Obama<br />
and his leftist Democractic administration have accomplished, just one? </p>
<p>No one gave me an answer.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe you.  Either you&#8217;re four aquaintances are brain-damaged, or they would have said:</p>
<p>1:  Tax cuts and credits for 95% of Americans, to help with school, stimulate the economy, keep more pay in the pockets of workers, amounting to 282 billion dollars, more than Bush ever cut in one year.</p>
<p>2:  Put 19 bil of the stimulus money to install a new universal healthcare IT system that could save thousands of lives, billions of dollars, and millions of hours of wasteful paperwork.</p>
<p>3:  Approved thousands of highway projects to overhaul our aging transportation infrastructure, something the Bush administration completely neglected.</p>
<p>4:  Added two million acres to our protected lands.</p>
<p>5:  Stopped the recession and began the road to recovery, averting a possible depression.</p>
<p>And on and on.  has he done enough for me?  No.  has he don;e what you guys want?  Of course not.  Has he accomplished nothing?  You&#8217;d have to live under a rock to beieve that stupidity.</p>
<p>Micky,</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t even get into the Afghan/casualty argument with you because you know I&#8217;m right, you know Bush is to blame, but you just can&#8217;t admit it.  So whatever.</p>
<p>We were never attacked under Carter.  Not in any way like 9/11, anyway.  It was with Bush as president that we sufffered <em>the worst terrorist attack in US history</em>.  I wouldn&#8217;t brag about that if I were you.  And if you really think that if Clinton had killed OBL that 98/11 wouldn&#8217;t have appened then you don&#8217;t know anything whatsoever about terrorism, or 9/11, or modern history.  The terrorists of 9/11 <em>wanted</em> war, they <em>wanted</em> Bush&#8217;s reaction, they <em>wanted</em> people like you to overreact.  You gave them everything they wanted.</p>
<p>Carter, Obama and Clinton have never held diplomacy with terrorists.  Are you lying or just don&#8217;t know any better?</p>
<p>JMJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micky 2</title>
		<link>http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2009/12/all-in-or-all-out/#comment-21257</link>
		<dc:creator>Micky 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/?p=6480#comment-21257</guid>
		<description>"That, as any honest and informed person well knows, is because Obama finally brought the fight to the resurgent Taliban in Afghanistan. Casualties shot up when the “surge” first began in Iraq as well, and once again, hypocritically, I didin’t hear any conservatives complaining then. 

Bull.
There were more casualties than ever because they were under manned you dingaling, thats why the call for re enforcements.
Now we will see additional casualties with this surge as there was no surge previously to blame casualties on as you so unwittingly claimed.

The plan to "bring the fight to the resurgents Taliban" was a plan left in place for him by the Bush administration that called for additional troops buddy.


"And yet another cheap shot: “Not one attack on American soil since 911 until Obama came into office and then we sufferd two in less than 10 months.” I don’t know what the second attack was, but Major Hasan was a growing threat long before Obama came along. And you’d think 9/11 was bad enough! To actually have the unmitigated gall to call avoiding another attack is astounding. 9/11 happened on Bush’s watch. You’d think that would be bad enough."

Whats cheap about the truth ?
Also, I guess since you're so damn well informed like you're always bragging you got carried away and forgot about the radical Muslims that bombed a recruitment center.
And really, give it already would you ?

yeah, 911 happened on Bushs watch but of all the attacks on America regardless of whos watch it was Bush was the first president with any balls to actually finally do something about it and did prevent any attacks since then. No other administration can make that claim.
PERIOD !!!

Carter let us be attacked, did nothing.
Clinton let us be attacked, numerous times,did hardly anything, bombed Bosnia instead.
Had Clinton, with guaranteed opportunities to kil Bin Laden done what he was supposed to there would of been no Al Queda to launch 911.

So please, if you want to maintain whatever dignity you have left stop running off this ridiculous "911 happened on Bushs watch" CRAP.


"And then this silliness: “Terrorist dont recognize diplomacy…”

You really didn’t know what I was talking about, did you? I didn’t mean diplomacy with terrorists. I meant diplomacy with states that can help us fight terrorism. You can’t have diplomacy of terrorists anyway - they’re not states. That’s also, by the way, why you can’t go to war with terrorism. Armies fight armies, not organized crime.

Micky, you did not substantively address any of my points with the exception of your laudable condemnation of the Rumsfeld Doctrine.



Right, you just tried to refute numerous points that I addressed, scroll up and try to count bozo.
Are you HIGH ?
I quoted and addressed everything in your first post !
I went right down the line buddy.

no argument left ?
thats alright, just make something up.


"That’s also, by the way, why you can’t go to war with terrorism. Armies fight armies, not organized crime."

Oh, just because you say so ?
One can go to war with anything thyey like Jersey.

Then tell me how it is different gangs and other crime organizations go to war against each other ?

Then tell your buddies to stop trying to convict Bush of war crimes.
And you yourself had better stop calling it a war if you want to keep looking like one with  brain.


"You really didn’t know what I was talking about, did you? I"

Of course I did. I've only heard the same dribble out of you about a hundred times now since you called terrorist unruly children.
It deserved as much attention as it got.
Organized criminalities do not wage war against countries.
They operate on the back of a rouge country by a government taken hostage.


"You can’t have diplomacy of terrorists "

You should of told that to Carter, Obama and Clinton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That, as any honest and informed person well knows, is because Obama finally brought the fight to the resurgent Taliban in Afghanistan. Casualties shot up when the “surge” first began in Iraq as well, and once again, hypocritically, I didin’t hear any conservatives complaining then. </p>
<p>Bull.<br />
There were more casualties than ever because they were under manned you dingaling, thats why the call for re enforcements.<br />
Now we will see additional casualties with this surge as there was no surge previously to blame casualties on as you so unwittingly claimed.</p>
<p>The plan to &#8220;bring the fight to the resurgents Taliban&#8221; was a plan left in place for him by the Bush administration that called for additional troops buddy.</p>
<p>&#8220;And yet another cheap shot: “Not one attack on American soil since 911 until Obama came into office and then we sufferd two in less than 10 months.” I don’t know what the second attack was, but Major Hasan was a growing threat long before Obama came along. And you’d think 9/11 was bad enough! To actually have the unmitigated gall to call avoiding another attack is astounding. 9/11 happened on Bush’s watch. You’d think that would be bad enough.&#8221;</p>
<p>Whats cheap about the truth ?<br />
Also, I guess since you&#8217;re so damn well informed like you&#8217;re always bragging you got carried away and forgot about the radical Muslims that bombed a recruitment center.<br />
And really, give it already would you ?</p>
<p>yeah, 911 happened on Bushs watch but of all the attacks on America regardless of whos watch it was Bush was the first president with any balls to actually finally do something about it and did prevent any attacks since then. No other administration can make that claim.<br />
PERIOD !!!</p>
<p>Carter let us be attacked, did nothing.<br />
Clinton let us be attacked, numerous times,did hardly anything, bombed Bosnia instead.<br />
Had Clinton, with guaranteed opportunities to kil Bin Laden done what he was supposed to there would of been no Al Queda to launch 911.</p>
<p>So please, if you want to maintain whatever dignity you have left stop running off this ridiculous &#8220;911 happened on Bushs watch&#8221; CRAP.</p>
<p>&#8220;And then this silliness: “Terrorist dont recognize diplomacy…”</p>
<p>You really didn’t know what I was talking about, did you? I didn’t mean diplomacy with terrorists. I meant diplomacy with states that can help us fight terrorism. You can’t have diplomacy of terrorists anyway - they’re not states. That’s also, by the way, why you can’t go to war with terrorism. Armies fight armies, not organized crime.</p>
<p>Micky, you did not substantively address any of my points with the exception of your laudable condemnation of the Rumsfeld Doctrine.</p>
<p>Right, you just tried to refute numerous points that I addressed, scroll up and try to count bozo.<br />
Are you HIGH ?<br />
I quoted and addressed everything in your first post !<br />
I went right down the line buddy.</p>
<p>no argument left ?<br />
thats alright, just make something up.</p>
<p>&#8220;That’s also, by the way, why you can’t go to war with terrorism. Armies fight armies, not organized crime.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh, just because you say so ?<br />
One can go to war with anything thyey like Jersey.</p>
<p>Then tell me how it is different gangs and other crime organizations go to war against each other ?</p>
<p>Then tell your buddies to stop trying to convict Bush of war crimes.<br />
And you yourself had better stop calling it a war if you want to keep looking like one with  brain.</p>
<p>&#8220;You really didn’t know what I was talking about, did you? I&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course I did. I&#8217;ve only heard the same dribble out of you about a hundred times now since you called terrorist unruly children.<br />
It deserved as much attention as it got.<br />
Organized criminalities do not wage war against countries.<br />
They operate on the back of a rouge country by a government taken hostage.</p>
<p>&#8220;You can’t have diplomacy of terrorists &#8221;</p>
<p>You should of told that to Carter, Obama and Clinton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dav Lev</title>
		<link>http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2009/12/all-in-or-all-out/#comment-21256</link>
		<dc:creator>Dav Lev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/?p=6480#comment-21256</guid>
		<description>There are other really important issues folks, on Obama's leftist salad
plate, the most exciting same sex marriages. 

I think he is for (and agains) the above..just cannot tell from 
his "dithering". Sound familar?

Anyway, New York State voted strongly AGAINST same sex marriages. 

Gosh, what is happening to the 2nd most liberal give-away state in 
the Union? I am frankly shocked. 

The liberal, do-gooder, tax and spend (Federal money), 3 states in one
(the City, the suburbs, and upstate) State, voting (what will G-d think?)
against same sex? What is next for the Empire State, legalizing guns
in the Big Apple, G-d forbid. 

Maybe it's the Algonquin Indians or the 5 tribe influence, I don't know? 

What miracle has happened to the state with "Miracle of miracles". 

Now don't get me wrong, I am not against laws which allow buddies, friends, acquaintences, even closet lovers, to visit friends in hospitals. 
If they can bare seeing their loved ones in the ICU, or CCU, on life support
with tubes everywhere, and IVS, and the stench of alcohol..that's fine with me. 

If buddies want to make contracts between themselves..like ownership
in the entirety (NY) of property, hey, whats wrong with that. 

If a lover wants to make a decision about providing hospice or 
medical treatment, (including end of life treatment), so what's wrong, 
as long as both agree beforehand. 

But same sex marriages? Hell no. 

Federal law folks, sometimes primes State laws. The bible (Judeo-Christian) primes man's law sometimes. The Laws of Moses cannot
be dismissed., most especially the laws pertaining to sex, marriage, 
and who sleeps with whom. 

There are reasons for the above, like the continuation of the species, 
get it, the continuation. G-d had a reason when he gave those laws
to Moses. 

Now I understand some people don't believe in G-d..or at least the G-d of the Jews and Christians. Some people believe in reincarnation. Okay, 
when you come back as a frog, talk to me. 

One Congressman from New York told another Congressman ( who is 
gay and voted for same sex by saying, leave your bible behind when you vote), bring your BIBLE IN WITH YOU. 

A person was heard saying that Hitler didn't treat some minorities with 
respect and dignity. Guess what, he murdered gays along with Jews and 
gypsies. No discrimination there. So what's the argument? 

Just another interesting and fascinating day in loveable New York, 
the biggest debtor state behind California that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are other really important issues folks, on Obama&#8217;s leftist salad<br />
plate, the most exciting same sex marriages. </p>
<p>I think he is for (and agains) the above..just cannot tell from<br />
his &#8220;dithering&#8221;. Sound familar?</p>
<p>Anyway, New York State voted strongly AGAINST same sex marriages. </p>
<p>Gosh, what is happening to the 2nd most liberal give-away state in<br />
the Union? I am frankly shocked. </p>
<p>The liberal, do-gooder, tax and spend (Federal money), 3 states in one<br />
(the City, the suburbs, and upstate) State, voting (what will G-d think?)<br />
against same sex? What is next for the Empire State, legalizing guns<br />
in the Big Apple, G-d forbid. </p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s the Algonquin Indians or the 5 tribe influence, I don&#8217;t know? </p>
<p>What miracle has happened to the state with &#8220;Miracle of miracles&#8221;. </p>
<p>Now don&#8217;t get me wrong, I am not against laws which allow buddies, friends, acquaintences, even closet lovers, to visit friends in hospitals.<br />
If they can bare seeing their loved ones in the ICU, or CCU, on life support<br />
with tubes everywhere, and IVS, and the stench of alcohol..that&#8217;s fine with me. </p>
<p>If buddies want to make contracts between themselves..like ownership<br />
in the entirety (NY) of property, hey, whats wrong with that. </p>
<p>If a lover wants to make a decision about providing hospice or<br />
medical treatment, (including end of life treatment), so what&#8217;s wrong,<br />
as long as both agree beforehand. </p>
<p>But same sex marriages? Hell no. </p>
<p>Federal law folks, sometimes primes State laws. The bible (Judeo-Christian) primes man&#8217;s law sometimes. The Laws of Moses cannot<br />
be dismissed., most especially the laws pertaining to sex, marriage,<br />
and who sleeps with whom. </p>
<p>There are reasons for the above, like the continuation of the species,<br />
get it, the continuation. G-d had a reason when he gave those laws<br />
to Moses. </p>
<p>Now I understand some people don&#8217;t believe in G-d..or at least the G-d of the Jews and Christians. Some people believe in reincarnation. Okay,<br />
when you come back as a frog, talk to me. </p>
<p>One Congressman from New York told another Congressman ( who is<br />
gay and voted for same sex by saying, leave your bible behind when you vote), bring your BIBLE IN WITH YOU. </p>
<p>A person was heard saying that Hitler didn&#8217;t treat some minorities with<br />
respect and dignity. Guess what, he murdered gays along with Jews and<br />
gypsies. No discrimination there. So what&#8217;s the argument? </p>
<p>Just another interesting and fascinating day in loveable New York,<br />
the biggest debtor state behind California that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dav Lev</title>
		<link>http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2009/12/all-in-or-all-out/#comment-21255</link>
		<dc:creator>Dav Lev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/?p=6480#comment-21255</guid>
		<description>This morning, I had breakfast with four (shall I call them) acquaintences.

Of course the hot topic of discussion was Obama's speech to the nation about Afghanistan. 

One person who I had never met before, said he was so upset over
Obama's continuing the war there, he turned his TV set to other channels, only to see Obama's face on all. He ultimately turned off the set entirely. 
He told us that he voted for Obama, the long waited for hope. That the people from the bottom up would now run the country. 

He said we have gotten simply 8 more years of Bush policies..now that
Obama's War is upon us full time. ( Some reporters say Obama's War
started last January 2009). He hated Bush, and is more than a little upset and disappointed with Obama, who he believes is being controlled by 
the Pentagon. 
 
I told him and the others that I had seen through the empty and foolish
campaign issues and promises..and voted for McCain, even though I
was not totally in agreement with HIS POLICIES, including immigration (allowing amnestry for 11m illegals). 

Then I asked the four persons to give me one example of what Obama
and his leftist Democractic administration have accomplished, just one? 

No one gave me an answer. 

Now, I am not any kind of genius, just your average middle aged Jew
who believes in G-d, gives charity, tries to obey some of the laws of Moses, (including the prohibition against same sex marriages), and tries
my utmost to keep kosher (when possible). I believe in the 10 commandments. I respect all other peoples, cept people who are trying to kill me and my friends and family or have done same. I admit to NOT liking them. 

I favor the death penalty, for people like Mohammad (currently in 
Gitmo-soon to be tried near friends in Lower Manhattan for 
arranging the deaths of 3,000 fellow Americans with the hope for 
100,000 more at that TIME.

I want to see Kuntar and Barghouti ( Palestinians) hung by a 12.00 hangman's noose..and hate the idea that both may soon be free to kill again. I want to personallly watch the hanging of that Austrian or German
being tried in Germany for slaughtering over 22,000 innocent  men, women and children. I have no feelings whatsoever of pity for the above. 

I deplore liberal do-gooders and social workers..who would try to 
appreciate the stresses and strains that the above were in at the time
of thOSE murders and thus allow them to continue their lives unaffected
by past crimes. 

I pointed out to the gentleman that Obama campaigned on Afghanistan
being the "just war", unlike Iraq, which was not a war of necessity (no war fought is a war of necessity unless the country faces it's demise). 

Neither our involvement in Iraq or Afghanistan are wars of necessity..just 
ones to contain a foe whose sole ambition is OUR demise. 

One of the others at the breakfast noted that the Republicans were against the Afghanistan build-up. I corrected that inaccurate observation. The Republicans favor our defeating Islamic-fascism wherever it is. The Democrats favor benchmarks, a time-line ( to defeat ourselves) and 
an exit strategy (before we know one). 

Or as a reporter for the NYTimes wrote today, the Taliban can wait another
80 years for US to abandon Afghanistan. I agree. 

I did suggest that all Americans should feel the pain however of this new
wrinkle. We should all pay an additional 2% surtax on our Federal taxes, 
and consider bringing back the draft, starting with 18 year olds. 

That shook them up. 

I would pay another 2% gladly, considering I'm not placing myself in harm's way. But their reaction was revealing. 

I would not except the college students from the draft. It's, for them, 
a way out of having to pay higher tuition fees. They will get paid, plus
free room and board, won't they, besides gleaning invaluable life's experiences. 

It was mentioned to me that the Karzai government is corrupt through
and through..therefore why send more troops, to reward him?

I answer, caus we are better off fighting them THERE, than here, again. 
That's why. I revealed that according to some websites, there are hundreds of Jihadist cells right here in the USA, most especially California. 
They were surprised at that and skeptical. 

Soooo, what to do? If I were Obama, I would send those 30,000 troops
as fast as possible, increase everyone' tax 1-2%, threaten a draft if
we are needed in other hot spots (like Iran). I agree with John McCain, 
we never should have given a date certain, or nearly certain, to bring home the boys (all the troops). That just emboldens our enemies. 

Youd better believe that No. Korea, Venezuela and Iran are watching
everything we do and listening attentively to every word Obama
utters. 

Iran today said it will enrich it's uranium beyond what it has achieved to date, besides building 10 more nuke sites (for electricity purposes only). 

In the other M.E. hotspot, Hezbollah is meeting with Hamas. They agreed
that 5m Muslims must be allowed to move to Israel itself. and that Lebanon's decision not to disarm Hezbollah is a move in the right direction. 

Of course we could all think like Ron Paul and remove ALL our troops and bases from the entire planet..back to mother US. Now that would 
be something to behold. 

Hey guys, why not try it, what do we have to lose? 

I read in a local paper that in 1938, a German military leader sent
a private letter to England stating that if England attacked, the government
( then a coalition) in Germany would fall. Instead, England sent Chamberlain. 

7 years later, and 70 million dead, the war ended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning, I had breakfast with four (shall I call them) acquaintences.</p>
<p>Of course the hot topic of discussion was Obama&#8217;s speech to the nation about Afghanistan. </p>
<p>One person who I had never met before, said he was so upset over<br />
Obama&#8217;s continuing the war there, he turned his TV set to other channels, only to see Obama&#8217;s face on all. He ultimately turned off the set entirely.<br />
He told us that he voted for Obama, the long waited for hope. That the people from the bottom up would now run the country. </p>
<p>He said we have gotten simply 8 more years of Bush policies..now that<br />
Obama&#8217;s War is upon us full time. ( Some reporters say Obama&#8217;s War<br />
started last January 2009). He hated Bush, and is more than a little upset and disappointed with Obama, who he believes is being controlled by<br />
the Pentagon. </p>
<p>I told him and the others that I had seen through the empty and foolish<br />
campaign issues and promises..and voted for McCain, even though I<br />
was not totally in agreement with HIS POLICIES, including immigration (allowing amnestry for 11m illegals). </p>
<p>Then I asked the four persons to give me one example of what Obama<br />
and his leftist Democractic administration have accomplished, just one? </p>
<p>No one gave me an answer. </p>
<p>Now, I am not any kind of genius, just your average middle aged Jew<br />
who believes in G-d, gives charity, tries to obey some of the laws of Moses, (including the prohibition against same sex marriages), and tries<br />
my utmost to keep kosher (when possible). I believe in the 10 commandments. I respect all other peoples, cept people who are trying to kill me and my friends and family or have done same. I admit to NOT liking them. </p>
<p>I favor the death penalty, for people like Mohammad (currently in<br />
Gitmo-soon to be tried near friends in Lower Manhattan for<br />
arranging the deaths of 3,000 fellow Americans with the hope for<br />
100,000 more at that TIME.</p>
<p>I want to see Kuntar and Barghouti ( Palestinians) hung by a 12.00 hangman&#8217;s noose..and hate the idea that both may soon be free to kill again. I want to personallly watch the hanging of that Austrian or German<br />
being tried in Germany for slaughtering over 22,000 innocent  men, women and children. I have no feelings whatsoever of pity for the above. </p>
<p>I deplore liberal do-gooders and social workers..who would try to<br />
appreciate the stresses and strains that the above were in at the time<br />
of thOSE murders and thus allow them to continue their lives unaffected<br />
by past crimes. </p>
<p>I pointed out to the gentleman that Obama campaigned on Afghanistan<br />
being the &#8220;just war&#8221;, unlike Iraq, which was not a war of necessity (no war fought is a war of necessity unless the country faces it&#8217;s demise). </p>
<p>Neither our involvement in Iraq or Afghanistan are wars of necessity..just<br />
ones to contain a foe whose sole ambition is OUR demise. </p>
<p>One of the others at the breakfast noted that the Republicans were against the Afghanistan build-up. I corrected that inaccurate observation. The Republicans favor our defeating Islamic-fascism wherever it is. The Democrats favor benchmarks, a time-line ( to defeat ourselves) and<br />
an exit strategy (before we know one). </p>
<p>Or as a reporter for the NYTimes wrote today, the Taliban can wait another<br />
80 years for US to abandon Afghanistan. I agree. </p>
<p>I did suggest that all Americans should feel the pain however of this new<br />
wrinkle. We should all pay an additional 2% surtax on our Federal taxes,<br />
and consider bringing back the draft, starting with 18 year olds. </p>
<p>That shook them up. </p>
<p>I would pay another 2% gladly, considering I&#8217;m not placing myself in harm&#8217;s way. But their reaction was revealing. </p>
<p>I would not except the college students from the draft. It&#8217;s, for them,<br />
a way out of having to pay higher tuition fees. They will get paid, plus<br />
free room and board, won&#8217;t they, besides gleaning invaluable life&#8217;s experiences. </p>
<p>It was mentioned to me that the Karzai government is corrupt through<br />
and through..therefore why send more troops, to reward him?</p>
<p>I answer, caus we are better off fighting them THERE, than here, again.<br />
That&#8217;s why. I revealed that according to some websites, there are hundreds of Jihadist cells right here in the USA, most especially California.<br />
They were surprised at that and skeptical. </p>
<p>Soooo, what to do? If I were Obama, I would send those 30,000 troops<br />
as fast as possible, increase everyone&#8217; tax 1-2%, threaten a draft if<br />
we are needed in other hot spots (like Iran). I agree with John McCain,<br />
we never should have given a date certain, or nearly certain, to bring home the boys (all the troops). That just emboldens our enemies. </p>
<p>Youd better believe that No. Korea, Venezuela and Iran are watching<br />
everything we do and listening attentively to every word Obama<br />
utters. </p>
<p>Iran today said it will enrich it&#8217;s uranium beyond what it has achieved to date, besides building 10 more nuke sites (for electricity purposes only). </p>
<p>In the other M.E. hotspot, Hezbollah is meeting with Hamas. They agreed<br />
that 5m Muslims must be allowed to move to Israel itself. and that Lebanon&#8217;s decision not to disarm Hezbollah is a move in the right direction. </p>
<p>Of course we could all think like Ron Paul and remove ALL our troops and bases from the entire planet..back to mother US. Now that would<br />
be something to behold. </p>
<p>Hey guys, why not try it, what do we have to lose? </p>
<p>I read in a local paper that in 1938, a German military leader sent<br />
a private letter to England stating that if England attacked, the government<br />
( then a coalition) in Germany would fall. Instead, England sent Chamberlain. </p>
<p>7 years later, and 70 million dead, the war ended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
