<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RJC in Santa Monica&#8211;Senator John Thune</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2009/07/rjc-in-santa-monica-senator-john-thune/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2009/07/rjc-in-santa-monica-senator-john-thune/</link>
	<description>Drinking the love from her Holy Grail</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jersey McJones</title>
		<link>http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2009/07/rjc-in-santa-monica-senator-john-thune/#comment-16895</link>
		<dc:creator>Jersey McJones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/?p=4458#comment-16895</guid>
		<description>Wow.  Considering what the GOP has done to the nation over the years, Dan Lev must REALLY hate them!

JMJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  Considering what the GOP has done to the nation over the years, Dan Lev must REALLY hate them!</p>
<p>JMJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dav Lev</title>
		<link>http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2009/07/rjc-in-santa-monica-senator-john-thune/#comment-16884</link>
		<dc:creator>Dav Lev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/?p=4458#comment-16884</guid>
		<description>Norm Coleman's defeat is a calamity for the Republican Party
and the USA. 

Now we have a not so humorist humorist, in the Senate. I've listened
to his jokes and find them bland. He is a liberal of the worst sort, and
we know what his position will be on every Obama policy. 

This is a very sad day for America. 

For anyone interested, pick up this week's JJ (Jewish Journa), a typically
left wing rag sheet. 

There is an article criticizing "Commentary" Magazine, one of a handfull
of conservative publications, which reaches out to Jews mainly. 

I subscribe to it. 

The article, written by the editor, says that this magazine has 
veered from it's original course...(an old magazine). Originally
meant as a liberal voice, it now is only conservative..appeasing
those who it reaches with tired and retreaded articles about why liberals are bad for America without providing any alternative and therefore
good debate.

Yet, the JJ appeals to people (average reader family earns over 250,000
per year (not your average), with a liberal bent. That doesn't seem to 
bother the editor's criticism of Commentary. 

I read both...and many other publications. for an understanding
of all sides of the issues. 

I admit to being a moderate Republican Jew...Conservative by
affiliation. I want more Jews, not less. I am against the Orthodox
having so much say in who is a Jew. I want both the father and 
mother to determine the faith of their offspring, who might accept
or no accept their influence ultimately anyway. 

I don't believe the "egg" should determine the religion of the child. 
Without the sperm ("code"), there would be no offspring. 

We Jews are not a race..studies have proven that. We have also 
been intermarying for centuries. We have black, brown and blond hair. 
I have blue eyes. Some Jews have dark eyes and are dark skinned. 
Some Jews have curly hair, others straight. 

The JJ article says over 75% of US Jews voted for Obama..therefore
his brand of government should have equal representation in the magazine. 

Who ever said Jews are wise? 

85% of California Jews voted No. on Prop 8, despite what G-d said
to Moses. 

Perhaps it is the JJ that is really the danger to US, and not Commentary? 

Maybe if more Jews read Commentary, and understood that even though
we are the "light unto the nations" we don't need to support the planet, 
or pay through our noses to support people who think they are entitled
to benefits from the cradle to the grave and the rich, successful and 
enterprising must support those less ambitious, energetic and accomplished (we do have social security, welfare, medicare and 
medical guys). 

I mean, Obama wants US to pay for health insurance for 11m illegal
aliens...

He is printing money like it's going out of style..to be paid back for
generations by our children and grandchildren. That is our 
legacy to them. 

Pity US all. Pity the not so wise Jews and others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norm Coleman&#8217;s defeat is a calamity for the Republican Party<br />
and the USA. </p>
<p>Now we have a not so humorist humorist, in the Senate. I&#8217;ve listened<br />
to his jokes and find them bland. He is a liberal of the worst sort, and<br />
we know what his position will be on every Obama policy. </p>
<p>This is a very sad day for America. </p>
<p>For anyone interested, pick up this week&#8217;s JJ (Jewish Journa), a typically<br />
left wing rag sheet. </p>
<p>There is an article criticizing &#8220;Commentary&#8221; Magazine, one of a handfull<br />
of conservative publications, which reaches out to Jews mainly. </p>
<p>I subscribe to it. </p>
<p>The article, written by the editor, says that this magazine has<br />
veered from it&#8217;s original course&#8230;(an old magazine). Originally<br />
meant as a liberal voice, it now is only conservative..appeasing<br />
those who it reaches with tired and retreaded articles about why liberals are bad for America without providing any alternative and therefore<br />
good debate.</p>
<p>Yet, the JJ appeals to people (average reader family earns over 250,000<br />
per year (not your average), with a liberal bent. That doesn&#8217;t seem to<br />
bother the editor&#8217;s criticism of Commentary. </p>
<p>I read both&#8230;and many other publications. for an understanding<br />
of all sides of the issues. </p>
<p>I admit to being a moderate Republican Jew&#8230;Conservative by<br />
affiliation. I want more Jews, not less. I am against the Orthodox<br />
having so much say in who is a Jew. I want both the father and<br />
mother to determine the faith of their offspring, who might accept<br />
or no accept their influence ultimately anyway. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe the &#8220;egg&#8221; should determine the religion of the child.<br />
Without the sperm (&#8221;code&#8221;), there would be no offspring. </p>
<p>We Jews are not a race..studies have proven that. We have also<br />
been intermarying for centuries. We have black, brown and blond hair.<br />
I have blue eyes. Some Jews have dark eyes and are dark skinned.<br />
Some Jews have curly hair, others straight. </p>
<p>The JJ article says over 75% of US Jews voted for Obama..therefore<br />
his brand of government should have equal representation in the magazine. </p>
<p>Who ever said Jews are wise? </p>
<p>85% of California Jews voted No. on Prop 8, despite what G-d said<br />
to Moses. </p>
<p>Perhaps it is the JJ that is really the danger to US, and not Commentary? </p>
<p>Maybe if more Jews read Commentary, and understood that even though<br />
we are the &#8220;light unto the nations&#8221; we don&#8217;t need to support the planet,<br />
or pay through our noses to support people who think they are entitled<br />
to benefits from the cradle to the grave and the rich, successful and<br />
enterprising must support those less ambitious, energetic and accomplished (we do have social security, welfare, medicare and<br />
medical guys). </p>
<p>I mean, Obama wants US to pay for health insurance for 11m illegal<br />
aliens&#8230;</p>
<p>He is printing money like it&#8217;s going out of style..to be paid back for<br />
generations by our children and grandchildren. That is our<br />
legacy to them. </p>
<p>Pity US all. Pity the not so wise Jews and others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
