JMJ

Again, we learn about “Mr. Nuance” and “Mr. Fourflusher” Obama.

Bibi Netanyahu came to try and convince our President (and country) that Iran means business when it repeatedly threatens “to wipe the Zionist racist state off the map”.

While back in the Palestinian territories, Abbas refuses to accept
the Jewish state as a Jewish state. That’s like not accepting Saudi
Arabia and 22 other Arab countries as Islamic states.

Oh me oh my.

Obama didn’t blink before Bibi’s attempts to him to start some kind
of action against Ahmad and the mad mullahs ruling Iran. Instead
he said that hopefully by the end of 2009, there will be movement
on Iran’s part to end it’s pursuits. End of 2009? It is estimated that
with 7,000 centrifuges, it already has enough uranium for one bomb.
(Iran estimates 50,000 centrifuges by years end, or enough to make
dozens of bombs).

And guess who Iran wants to eradicate from the M.E., you guessed right,
Israel. Who will be second? Your guess?

In the so-called occupied territories ( I ask, who is actually being occupied?) Hamas now says catagorically that it won’t recognize 2 states. In other words, it wants the land between the Med. Sea and Jordan River
Judenrein (no Jews). It, like Hezbollah to the north, and Iran, has openly
declared the Jewish state’s existence null and void.

Soooo, while Obama makes for the pleasant rhetoric..Iran continues to
enrich it’s uranium (for peaceful purposes, SURE) and is now supplying
Hamas with Fajr Missiles ( 3 stage rockets which can hit Tel Aviv, the airport and Israel’s nuke site at Dimona).

For a diversion, Lebanon is demanding through UNIFIL, that Israel give back a few alleged spies, who crossed over the border after their lives have been threatened by Lebanese authorities. . Israel has not said anything.

What should Obama have done?

Well for starters, no right of return TO Israel of the
so-called Palestinian refugees. Secondly, he should have indicated
that Bibi’s solution…autonomy for the Palestinians with Israeli security AND a demilitarized W. Bk., is the correct and only viable one for the area.

He should have approved Israel’s taking out at least 9 Iranian nuke sites, using whatever means necessary, w/o US restrictions (but with US concurrence) if all else fails. (Israel has 400 high fusion nukes).

He should have warned Hamas about firing rockets into Israel..as
the real deal breaker for a viable solution. He should have
approved giving Israel the computers for the F-35 jet figher planes on
order.

He should have demanded Abbas and Hamas abide by the Road Map to
stop the incitement to violence, stop the teaching of hatred, and root
out the militants., accept Israel’s existence and adhere to the
prior arrangements between Fatah and Israel.

Instead, we see another of Obama’s clever avoidance to resolve
the most important problems facing US, just brushing the dirt
beneath the rug.

From Notre Dame to the W. Bank, it’s more of the same.

Or as we say, “It’s a shonda”. (A shame).

“It would be atrocious for anybody to get (dis?)barred. We want the best and brightest attorneys. The top attorneys will not serve their country if they have a fear of prosecution hanging over every piece of legal advice they give.”

If that’s who Chambliss thinks are the “best and brightest attorneys” then I say we immediate disbar every attorney he endorses! They were a bunch of dumb shmucks.

“Nobody from Mayberry to New York City wants terrorists in their area. The decision to close Gitmo was done to appease the far left and keep a campaign promise. Will Obama flip-flop? There could be thoughts about that.”

this is just stupid. As long as the GOP keeps spouting this kind of sleazy stupidy, they’re going to be in the political woods. People are only so stupid. No one is talking about releasing known, or even suspected, terrorists out onto the American street. Ridiculous. Anyone who believes this nonsense is a moron.

Dan, most of the Catholics at the school support Obama. You can be a pro-life Catholic and still believe that you shouldn’t impose your personal religious view on everyone else. Heck, lots of Christians don’t even believe abortion is a serious sin - or even a sin at all. After all, there is ABOSLUTELY NO mention of abortion in the Bible.

JMJ

I call him, Mr. Nuance…or better, Mr. Fourflusher.
For anyone not knowing what a fourflusher is, simply go
to your dictionary.

So far, I’ve accumulateda about 20 reversals that Mr. Obama has
made since beginning his campaigns to defeat Hillary and then
John McCain.

Let me describe the last, per the LA Times.

At Notre Dame University, he was applauded by thousands of
college students when he spoke recently. These were the gullible, naive
and innocents who voted heavily for him last November, while their
parents voted the majority for McCain., not enough to defeat
Mr. Obama and his crew of expert advisers.

This issue at the university was abortion. He is for it..giving the
mother the right to choose.

Since the majority of Americans are for abortions, at least in the
first tri-mester, what is the problemo?

The Catholic students are AGAINST abortions under any circumstance..
per the dictates from the Vatican in Rome.

Now, I don’t have any qualms about church dictates and respect
people’s right to express themselves on this issue.

The problem with Obama, has is straddling the fence, as he has
on virtually every issue confronting our country.

He says he understands the contentiousness of the issue, and
why both sides believe they are in the right. He wants
both sides to respect one another.

Okay, so where does that leave him and his administration?

Either you are for abortion, or you ain’t.

Is a fetus a fetus, or an unborn person? Is a fetus a fetus or
a child?

I fetus CANNOT survive outside it’s mother, until it is born.
It is NOT A PERSON..it is a fetus., plain and simple.

Unwanted babies become unwanted children..become anti-social
adults..which we all pay for in one way or another.

Most minority girls have babies without the benefit of marriage.
I ask, who pays for all of this?

Obama should have said he approves of the Supreme Court
decision about abortions..that it is the law of the land., without
eqivocation., (until changed that is, which is another issue).

If a woman doesn’t want to have the baby (usually conceived in
a moment of passion), then let HER and her doctor decide the
future., not Uncle Obama, nor the Catholic Church.

If a Catholic doesn’t want the baby, and is restrained by her
beliefs, so be it. But don’t foist that on the rest of US.

The Muslims believe in many wives..that doesn’t make it right
for US. Leave it to Obama, and he will change those laws.