Comments on: From Community Organizers to Socialites http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2008/12/from-community-organizers-to-socialites/ Drinking the love from her Holy Grail Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:36:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: Micky 2 http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2008/12/from-community-organizers-to-socialites/#comment-11939 Micky 2 Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:18:27 +0000 http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/?p=2494#comment-11939 " Sine there is no party that truly represents my political philosophy, I am not a partisan" Yet you defend democratic positions at every opportunity ? There are plenty of shades of grey inbetween the two strict adherences. You are so far in the dark you cant see your hand in front of your face. I know you would like to be able to slap some brand of uniqueness to yourself that would elevate you to some standing of where you look like the messiah of some new following because out of arrogance you dont want to labeled as some sort of joiner, a lemming, one of the pack, or that you're capable of thought process that no mere mortal could concieve. You voted for Obama. That puts you in his park, not your own, hes in control with all of his far left positions that you have persistantly backed. I dont care how unique you view yourself. When you vote for a person that holds those values you are representing those values. When faced with an enemy on the field I'm not going to stop to ask just how entrenched he is in his leaders ideology or if he wants to kill me full on, or just a little bit because he agrees on one of my positions. I dont want get along with him. He defends what I believe to be dangerous and I want him gone. All I know is that hes holding a gun at me in the name of that ideology and all his little intricasies that make him unique dont matter to me. "he is twice the man his brothers ever could be" "As far as I’m concerned, he’s yet another complete failure from the Bush family." You cannot be twice of anything that is complete. Unless theres two of you. If he is twice of what two complete failures are you are going off the chart into a negative. That is not possible after "completion" As SRJeff said, it was an emotional and illogical statement. Just knock it off already, it makes you look pathetic and ridiculous. I've goofed before and just said: "Wow, that came out all wrong". Try it and you will be free. Were not talking about dynasties of wealth. That would be another topic for another post. We are talking about political dynasties. Nice try though. ” Sine there is no party that truly represents my political philosophy, I am not a partisan”

Yet you defend democratic positions at every opportunity ?
There are plenty of shades of grey inbetween the two strict adherences.
You are so far in the dark you cant see your hand in front of your face.

I know you would like to be able to slap some brand of uniqueness to yourself that would elevate you to some standing of where you look like the messiah of some new following because out of arrogance you dont want to labeled as some sort of joiner, a lemming, one of the pack, or that you’re capable of thought process that no mere mortal could concieve.

You voted for Obama.
That puts you in his park, not your own, hes in control with all of his far left positions that you have persistantly backed.
I dont care how unique you view yourself. When you vote for a person that holds those values you are representing those values.
When faced with an enemy on the field I’m not going to stop to ask just how entrenched he is in his leaders ideology or if he wants to kill me full on, or just a little bit because he agrees on one of my positions.
I dont want get along with him.
He defends what I believe to be dangerous and I want him gone.
All I know is that hes holding a gun at me in the name of that ideology and all his little intricasies that make him unique dont matter to me.

“he is twice the man his brothers ever could be”
“As far as I’m concerned, he’s yet another complete failure from the Bush family.”

You cannot be twice of anything that is complete.
Unless theres two of you.
If he is twice of what two complete failures are you are going off the chart into a negative.
That is not possible after “completion”
As SRJeff said, it was an emotional and illogical statement.

Just knock it off already, it makes you look pathetic and ridiculous.
I’ve goofed before and just said: “Wow, that came out all wrong”.

Try it and you will be free.

Were not talking about dynasties of wealth.
That would be another topic for another post.
We are talking about political dynasties.

Nice try though.

]]> By: Jersey McJones http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2008/12/from-community-organizers-to-socialites/#comment-11937 Jersey McJones Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:41:18 +0000 http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/?p=2494#comment-11937 Micky, try to follow here. Jeb Bush seems like twice the man of his brothers, but that's not saying much. Yes, he's popular in Florida, but we're talking Florida here, not exactly America's cerebellum. All you have to do to be popular in Florida is hate Castro, wrap yourself up in the flag, and talk nicely to the people. My representative, Ginny Brown-Waite is about as effective a representative as a dead Gopher Tortoise, yet she wins reelections without so much as a campaign ad. Why? Because she hates Castro, wraps herself in the flag, and talks nicely to old people. This is Florida, Micky. I detest dynasties, myself. They represent every America is supposed to stand against. And yes, the Kennedies are the most famous of American political dynasties (why, I have no idea). But when it comes to dynasties of wealth, the Republicans almost completely corner the market. And when it comes to sheer numbers of dynasties, any honest and educated person would know that this is a evenly bipartisan problem. To be partisan, Micky, means that you belong to and adhere to the tenets of a PARTY. Sine there is no party that truly represents my political philosophy, I am not a partisan. But all your mincing and parsing aside, I am a lefty and therefore I disagree with the righties most of the time. JMJ Micky, try to follow here. Jeb Bush seems like twice the man of his brothers, but that’s not saying much. Yes, he’s popular in Florida, but we’re talking Florida here, not exactly America’s cerebellum. All you have to do to be popular in Florida is hate Castro, wrap yourself up in the flag, and talk nicely to the people. My representative, Ginny Brown-Waite is about as effective a representative as a dead Gopher Tortoise, yet she wins reelections without so much as a campaign ad. Why? Because she hates Castro, wraps herself in the flag, and talks nicely to old people. This is Florida, Micky.

I detest dynasties, myself. They represent every America is supposed to stand against. And yes, the Kennedies are the most famous of American political dynasties (why, I have no idea). But when it comes to dynasties of wealth, the Republicans almost completely corner the market. And when it comes to sheer numbers of dynasties, any honest and educated person would know that this is a evenly bipartisan problem.

To be partisan, Micky, means that you belong to and adhere to the tenets of a PARTY. Sine there is no party that truly represents my political philosophy, I am not a partisan. But all your mincing and parsing aside, I am a lefty and therefore I disagree with the righties most of the time.

JMJ

]]> By: Micky 2 http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2008/12/from-community-organizers-to-socialites/#comment-11927 Micky 2 Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:38:13 +0000 http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/?p=2494#comment-11927 Jersy, just admit it was a dumb statement and move on. You just look ridicilous when you start backtracking trying cover up your poisoned head. If Jeb were a liberal , instead you would be pointing out all the wonderful things hes done and he would be a complete success. "As for dynasties, look at Mitt Romney, the Bushes, the Sununus, Hunters, Reynolds, etc. There’s plenty of Republcian dynasties too." Still. Do the math and pay attention, I said including the three Bushs the left still has the monopoly on dynasties. Just the Kennedys alone out number the ones you mentioned. As I said, theres always gonna be a hand me down here and there. I'm not sure just how dumb you think I am but you are about the most partisan blogger I've ever run into. Your attacks on the right have been with consistent bias and partisanship for the last 2 years like no one else I've ever met on line. You are the role model moonbat. You say your not partisan yet you defend just about every lib and dem for anything. I'm not going to get into all the different breeds of republicans, they're as varied as people are but I stick to the main principles. Bye. My wife walked in the door, I got better things to do. Jersy, just admit it was a dumb statement and move on.
You just look ridicilous when you start backtracking trying cover up your poisoned head.
If Jeb were a liberal , instead you would be pointing out all the wonderful things hes done and he would be a complete success.

“As for dynasties, look at Mitt Romney, the Bushes, the Sununus, Hunters, Reynolds, etc. There’s plenty of Republcian dynasties too.”

Still.
Do the math and pay attention, I said including the three Bushs the left still has the monopoly on dynasties.
Just the Kennedys alone out number the ones you mentioned.
As I said, theres always gonna be a hand me down here and there.

I’m not sure just how dumb you think I am but you are about the most partisan blogger I’ve ever run into.
Your attacks on the right have been with consistent bias and partisanship for the last 2 years like no one else I’ve ever met on line.
You are the role model moonbat.
You say your not partisan yet you defend just about every lib and dem for anything.
I’m not going to get into all the different breeds of republicans, they’re as varied as people are but I stick to the main principles.

Bye.
My wife walked in the door, I got better things to do.

]]> By: Jersey McJones http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2008/12/from-community-organizers-to-socialites/#comment-11925 Jersey McJones Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:04:35 +0000 http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/?p=2494#comment-11925 Micky, the rather silly sematics you brought up aside, Jeb Bush, of all the brothers, always struck me as the brightest. It's the way he speaks, his demeanor and carraige, his more realistic and pragmatic politics. But Florida is in an abyssmal state. We've been in recession for two years now. Our "unemployment rate" is low, but our jobless rate is ridiculous. We have an insurmountable debt and deficit, and the insitutional infrastructure is pathetic. And there is endemic conflicted contracting corruption and abuse related to "privatization." That's failure. Period. jeb Bush may be the best of the Bush Boys, and he is very popular here, though I have no idea why, but his legacy here is failure. As for dynasties, look at Mitt Romney, the Bushes, the Sununus, Hunters, Reynolds, etc. There's plenty of Republcian dynasties too. As for partisanship, you can be a conservative and not be a partisan. Actually, if you really are conservative, you wouldn't be a republican. The republican party is an amalgam of libertarianism, democratic tyranny, conservatism, neoliberalism, corporatocracy, colonialism, statism, theocracy, nationalism, internationalism and imperialism. I don't know what the heck they are anymore. They'd better figure it out soon, though, lest they remain in the woods for a long time to come. JMJ Micky, the rather silly sematics you brought up aside, Jeb Bush, of all the brothers, always struck me as the brightest. It’s the way he speaks, his demeanor and carraige, his more realistic and pragmatic politics. But Florida is in an abyssmal state. We’ve been in recession for two years now. Our “unemployment rate” is low, but our jobless rate is ridiculous. We have an insurmountable debt and deficit, and the insitutional infrastructure is pathetic. And there is endemic conflicted contracting corruption and abuse related to “privatization.” That’s failure. Period. jeb Bush may be the best of the Bush Boys, and he is very popular here, though I have no idea why, but his legacy here is failure.

As for dynasties, look at Mitt Romney, the Bushes, the Sununus, Hunters, Reynolds, etc. There’s plenty of Republcian dynasties too.

As for partisanship, you can be a conservative and not be a partisan. Actually, if you really are conservative, you wouldn’t be a republican. The republican party is an amalgam of libertarianism, democratic tyranny, conservatism, neoliberalism, corporatocracy, colonialism, statism, theocracy, nationalism, internationalism and imperialism. I don’t know what the heck they are anymore. They’d better figure it out soon, though, lest they remain in the woods for a long time to come.

JMJ

]]> By: Joshua Godinez http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2008/12/from-community-organizers-to-socialites/#comment-11923 Joshua Godinez Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:32:34 +0000 http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/?p=2494#comment-11923 Chalk me up as one of those who is opposed to dynasties. I couldn't vote for a Bush again because I'm afraid that our kids would start thinking that political office is kind of a hereditary or family thing. I believe we're already too far in that direction with wives succeeding their husbands in the offices vacated by death. I can't make a blanket statement, though, because the situation is always the determining factor. I voted for Bush the first time because I thought Gore was a weak man who cared more about trees than Americans. Subsequent events have only reinforced that view. So, I put away my disquiet when the situation demanded it, but I'd much rather promote new names than the same old ones. The Kennedy's have more than overstayed their welcome. Chalk me up as one of those who is opposed to dynasties. I couldn’t vote for a Bush again because I’m afraid that our kids would start thinking that political office is kind of a hereditary or family thing. I believe we’re already too far in that direction with wives succeeding their husbands in the offices vacated by death. I can’t make a blanket statement, though, because the situation is always the determining factor. I voted for Bush the first time because I thought Gore was a weak man who cared more about trees than Americans. Subsequent events have only reinforced that view. So, I put away my disquiet when the situation demanded it, but I’d much rather promote new names than the same old ones. The Kennedy’s have more than overstayed their welcome.

]]> By: SRJeff http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2008/12/from-community-organizers-to-socialites/#comment-11922 SRJeff Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:44:25 +0000 http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/?p=2494#comment-11922 Mick, It's emoted, not thought. Read the Personal Ad Weeklies. Mick,

It’s emoted, not thought. Read the Personal Ad Weeklies.

]]> By: Micky 2 http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2008/12/from-community-organizers-to-socialites/#comment-11917 Micky 2 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:26:48 +0000 http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/?p=2494#comment-11917 Typical blind idiotic ideological bigotry is most eveident when its so steep that the person no matter how conciliatory they try to be end up contradicting themselves. "he is twice the man his brothers ever could be " "he’s yet another complete failure from the Bush family." How can you be "twice" of "complete failure" ? The Kennedys are the prime example of how the left loves its dynasties. Sure, the right has a couple of hand me downs but even if you add them all up including the three Bushs it doesnt come close to the trail of Kennedys that have been in government. It’ll be very intersting to see how the left defines experience in their support for Caroline after the reaming they gave Sarah Palin over her experience. “ I will never be a partisan.” Thats like saying I'll never be a conservative. Typical blind idiotic ideological bigotry is most eveident when its so steep that the person no matter how conciliatory they try to be end up contradicting themselves.

“he is twice the man his brothers ever could be ”

“he’s yet another complete failure from the Bush family.”

How can you be “twice” of “complete failure” ?

The Kennedys are the prime example of how the left loves its dynasties.
Sure, the right has a couple of hand me downs but even if you add them all up including the three Bushs it doesnt come close to the trail of Kennedys that have been in government.

It’ll be very intersting to see how the left defines experience in their support for Caroline after the reaming they gave Sarah Palin over her experience.

“ I will never be a partisan.”

Thats like saying I’ll never be a conservative.

]]> By: Jersey McJones http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/2008/12/from-community-organizers-to-socialites/#comment-11914 Jersey McJones Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:31:56 +0000 http://www.tygrrrrexpress.com/?p=2494#comment-11914 I'm not sure what you're going on about here. The GOP has been guilty of the same sorts of aristocratic behavior as the Dems, and I would argue even more - to the point where the GOP seems intent on strengthening an already entrenched American aristocracy at all costs, even removing the estate tax completely. As for Jeb Bush - yes, he is popular, and yes, he is twice the man his brothers ever could be, but Florida is a $#@!hole and he's partly to blame. As far as I'm concerned, he's yet another complete failure from the Bush family. Aside from that, I agree with you. This whole Caroline Kennedy thing is a huge mistake if you ask me. It will cause demoralization in the Democrat ranks, will PO grassroots liberals like me, and will only reinforce the hypocritical prejudices of the right. The same goes for Jesse Jackson Jr, Joe Biden's kid, etc. There are plenty of qualified rank and file Dems who deserve better than this. Yet another reason I will never be a partisan. JMJ I’m not sure what you’re going on about here. The GOP has been guilty of the same sorts of aristocratic behavior as the Dems, and I would argue even more - to the point where the GOP seems intent on strengthening an already entrenched American aristocracy at all costs, even removing the estate tax completely.

As for Jeb Bush - yes, he is popular, and yes, he is twice the man his brothers ever could be, but Florida is a $#@!hole and he’s partly to blame. As far as I’m concerned, he’s yet another complete failure from the Bush family.

Aside from that, I agree with you. This whole Caroline Kennedy thing is a huge mistake if you ask me. It will cause demoralization in the Democrat ranks, will PO grassroots liberals like me, and will only reinforce the hypocritical prejudices of the right. The same goes for Jesse Jackson Jr, Joe Biden’s kid, etc. There are plenty of qualified rank and file Dems who deserve better than this. Yet another reason I will never be a partisan.

JMJ

]]>