Comments on: Barack Hannah Montana Obama

By: steveegg

steveegg — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:01:48 +0000

The Morni…er, Afternoon Scramble - 7/28/2008…

Once again, I’m extremely late with this. Sorry about that; haven’t been feeling good since Ned Yost decided he didn’t like 1st place and Hen¢AR and Goodyear decided they didn’t like teams not owned by Hendrick……

By: No Runny Eggs » Blog Archive » The Morni…er, Afternoon Scramble - 7/28/2008

Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:00:47 +0000

[...] Eric dubs Obama the Hannah Montana of politics. [...]

By: Jersey McJones

Jersey McJones — Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:04:24 +0000

Yeah, she is an odd one, huh?

JMJ

By: Micky 2

Micky 2 — Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:20:40 +0000

Actually the head got placed around the pencil.
Its a little deeper than most kids under about 10 or 11 would be able to grasp and a lot of the violence is portgrayed with not so much gratuitous blood and guts.
They did a good job of just giving you the idea.
I would say the most graphic gore image was Harvey Two face after his accident.
It may just be personal taste on my part but I really dont understand why Rachel is portrayed as some stark raving beauty.
Theres a scene where Harvey tells her that she is sooo beautiful, and I just didnt get it. I was telling myself “yea right”
To me she looks like a blood hound with a hang over in some shots.

http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2008/startracks/080609/maggie_gyllenhaal.jpg

By: Jersey McJones

Jersey McJones — Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:14:41 +0000

Well, from what Micky just wrote, it looks like this film is definately not for young children!

JMJ

By: parrothead

parrothead — Sun, 27 Jul 2008 04:53:16 +0000

I guess the curse of having young children is I likely won’t get to see this flick til it comes out on DVD and then this whole discussion will be a distant memory.

By: Micky 2

Micky 2 — Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:49:41 +0000

The movie was good.
I think the character that best defined you in the movie was the pencil the joker shoved into the guys forehead

By: Micky 2

Micky 2 — Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:48:30 +0000

There you go again.
I remebember that debate and I have it all stashed away.
You defended that remark for days until you finally gave the analogy excuse.
you went into how they should be treated like common criminals or mobsters and bla bla.
It was a bad anaology if thats what you want to go with.
And it was childish.
Ya know, to bust out a little tom foolery is O.K. when its your agenda.
But when the other side does it its childish.
We are not the ones who want to treat terrorists like anything other than what they are.
The left seems to be more childish in the sense that they are naive to the reality of the threat.

I didnt think much of Helms either.
But to compare him to Satan is no funnier than comparing Bush to Satan.
But the point is that you would find humor in both those comparisons.

By: Jersey McJones

Jersey McJones — Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:32:50 +0000

Micky, really, a grown man, you’re age, that doesn’t get an analogy, a metaphor! I mean, c’mon! You’re a grown man!

Speaking of grown men… I’m looking forward to this new Batman flick too. The last one was pretty wild.

Just the same, to compare Bush to Batman is a bit misguided. I mean, afterall, Batman actually succeeds! LOL!

JMJ

By: Micky 2

Micky 2 — Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:08:49 +0000

My point !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

More the reason for you to lighten up a little and let others make theie own comparisons “ala humor”

And please, get honest.
I have copies with time stamps and the link showing where you said that.

Adults an also separate The Road runner and Wylie E Coyote from real life also.

Still, no matter what you think of Helms it just goes to show that we all indulge in frivilous humor.

Lighten up.
I’m going to watch Batman now and I will pick out in the movie whom I best think reminds me of you.

I may even write a post about it.
Dont forget your funnybone